The cost of prolonging the life of a terminal patient ‘cannot be justified’

28 Sep 2011
by Anna McLachlan, yourwellness writer
In a statement that’s certain to cause heated discussions on both sides of the fence, cancer experts have said that life-extending drugs are too costly to give to terminal cancer patients.

Around 310,000 people in Britain are diagnosed with cancer every year and the NHS spends over £5 billion a year on treatment. The group of cancer experts claimed that a ‘culture of excess’ had led doctors to ‘over treat, over diagnose and over promise’. They believe that instead of the costly drugs that brought ‘little value’, the money would be better spent invested in better scans and tests. However, this would then lead to the determination of how treatable a tumour would be, leaving ‘difficult decisions’ as to who would get treated.

To justify the report, the doctors try and play the emotional tack by saying:

“We clearly would want to spare the patient the toxicity and false hope associated with such treatment, as well as the expense.”

A spokesman for the Rarer Cancers Foundation hit back at the report however:

“Describing all the treatments near the end of life as futile is tantamount to writing patients off. Just because they cannot be ‘cured’ does not mean that we cannot give them valuable treatment, care and support.”

The experts may well be talking statistics and finances. The report may make logical sense. Unfortunately, the well-being of our family and friends is not a logical emotion and to expect them to gain even a few more days with the aid of an expensive drug sounds like a reasonable option. For a country that spends billions on war and politically correct madness, cuts should be made there first to top up the NHS funding. If cost cutting in the NHS comes to giving up on people who have contracted a disease through no fault of their own, the country will rightly be in uproar. They will be wondering why the NHS were allowed to spend £12.7 billion on a computer system that didn’t work, then begrudge paying a fraction of the cost to prolong life. At the end of the day, people should have the choice; it should not be taken away from them.




Leave Comments
Your rating:



 
 Security code
 
 
© 2011 Health Media Ltd (Dubai). No reproduction in whole or in part without written permission. All Rights Reserved.

All trademarks and product images exhibited on this site, unless otherwise indicated, are the property of Health Media Ltd (Dubai) and used under license.

The contents of Yourwellness, such as text, graphics, images, and other material contained on Yourwellness ("Content") are for informational purposes only. Our content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on Yourwellness!
 
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or Emergency Services IMMEDIATELY. Yourwellness does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on the site or in our magazine. Reliance on any information provided by Yourwellness, Yourwellness employees, experts appearing on the website at the invitation of Yourwellness, or other visitors to the site is solely at your own risk.
 
The Site may contain health or medical related materials that are sexually explicit. If you find these materials offensive, you may not want to use our Site. 

The yourwellness website and content are provided on an "as is" basis.


 
Contextual Links